The Impeccable Weirdness of Andrew Lohse’s Book Proposal

When we sat down to write this post, we felt like we knew what to say: that Andrew Lohse’s recently-leaked proposal for his 2014 memoir A Party at the End of the World is yet another artifact of the author’s well-intentioned but often preposterous campaign to reform Dartmouth’s Greek system while building his own media career.

To describe the proposal that way—to pathologize its author—de-emphasizes the context from which it emerged: namely, an anonymous group, vocally angry at Lohse and fearful of damage to their reputations, somehow obtained the book proposal, heavily redacted it, then published it online. Whoever orchestrated this coup wanted to discredit Lohse without sabotaging anyone else involved—including, of course, themselves. And this context is important: the proposal reveals nearly as much as it obscures. For example:

1. Whoever redacted the proposal doesn’t understand how redactions work. “Goldman Snacks,” as the group calls itself, tried to scrub Lohse’s proposal of certain details (names, descriptions, and the like) that identify SAE brothers. That effort failed. Take a look at this passage.

[Quote removed at request of Andrew Lohse.]

That’s a real person! Indeed, the President of the Dartmouth Review in October 2009 (identified here) was, according to an archived copy of the house’s website, a brother at SAE. This is the same person who apparently said he “would bring down the Review from the inside if it meant that [he] could save SAE” and who forced Lohse (according to the proposal) to chug six beers as a requirement of pledging.

2. Lohse actually admits he was an “especially harsh hazer”. This is unambiguous.

[Quote removed at request of Andrew Lohse.]

The urine-in-kiddie-pool aspect is remarkable because Lohse cited it, in his original column, as an especially gross method of SAE-style hazing that he himself was forced to endure. But, as we reported in February, Lohse and his pledge brothers were simply told there was urine in the kiddie pool, to freak them out. Here Lohse admits that he inflicted this particular form of hazing on pledges under his authority, based on the imagined precedent of his own pledge term.

This is insane! Lohse is admitting that he was an active agent of “Abu Ghraib-style feats of hazing,” a uniquely determined perpetrator of what he has repeatedly railed against.

3. Lohse is clearly angry about the leak. A Party at the End of the World is slated for publication in 2014; Lohse likely hasn’t even completed his first draft. In media mumbo-jumbo, he lost control of the narrative, and immediately tried to pry it back from “Goldman Snacks” by emailing a random PowerPoint presentation to Dartblog’s Joseph Asch, who later published a lengthy refutation of its most revelatory bits about SAE’s various endowments. (Sidenote: in the PowerPoint Lohse employs the word “dereifying”: exactly the sort of word Asch bitterly accused Dartmouth’s president of using, but that’s for another day.)

4. You might be able to guess who’s behind “Goldman Snacks.” The group’s website is built with the same rudimentary software as Check out the last entry in each site’s FAQ:

I’m concerned about this program and want to pay you off to stop. Is this possible?​
No comment.

Q. The style of writing on this website bears an uncanny resemblance to that of Dartmouth College Media Director Justin Anderson. Is he in any way affiliated with this Operation?
A. No comment.

When was asked about Hazing Tour creator Travis Blalock‘s involvement, Goldman Snacks told us:

Travis Blalock? Hahaha- Travis Blalock is just the tip of the iceberg. Clearly, you don’t understand what’s going on here. We have much to discuss tomorrow, including the connection between D columnist Jordan Osserman and Andrew Lohse.


Check this email tomorrow for further instructions on how to contact us.



PS: Check the dates.

Anyway, you can inspect the proposal here. Let us know about any curious passages in the comments.

3 Responses to “The Impeccable Weirdness of Andrew Lohse’s Book Proposal”

  1. Travis Blalock is innocent Says:

    So Goldman Snacks uses Wix to build a website (Wix has over 12 million users), answers a question with no comment, a phrase used by millions of people when answering a stupid question, and “when was asked” about Travis Blalock, one of the most well-known and influential people at Dartmouth, Goldman Snacks did not say anything that led you to Blalock. The leaps you are taking to determine who’s behind Goldman Snacks are almost as comical as the fact that you finally wrote about Lohse’s book weeks after the proposal leaked and the Dartmouth ran several stories on it. I’ll give you a clue: you’re wayyyy off.

  2. SMH D'11 Says:

    “well-known and influential”? Nice try travis blalock. Get off the internet.

  3. Tomian Says:

    I just read Lohse’s “pitch”. He’s the worst kind of jerk–an asshole who looks in the mirror and sees a god.

    Lohse and his story are good examples of why legacy admissions are bad. How schools that are run by and staffed with generally level-headed liberals can condone this overwhelmingly elitist system is beyond me. We’re it not for legacy admissions (and to some extent athletic), students like lohse and his cronies probably wouldn’t be at Dartmouth, adding little and learning less.

Leave a Reply

Login | Register | Leave Anonymous Comment