Aborto-Artist Was Faking; No Fetuses Were Hurt In the Making of This Senior Project

Aborto-Artist Was Faking; No Fetuses Were Hurt In the Making of This Senior ProjectAs the frenzy surrounding Aliza Shvarts’ abortion-goo finger-painting scandal escalated, some cried “bullshit“: “Herbal” abortion? Artificial insemination? Nine straight months of crampsing and hormonal fluctuation? Personally, I figured she was just really talented; it is Yale, after all. Not so, says Yale’s Office of Public Affairs in a public announcement:

Ms. Shvarts is engaged in performance art.  Her art project includes visual representations, a press release and other narrative materials.  She stated to three senior Yale University officials today, including two deans, that she did not impregnate herself and that she did not induce any miscarriages.  The entire project is an art piece, a creative fiction designed to draw attention to the ambiguity surrounding form and function of a woman’s body.

She is an artist and has the right to express herself through performance art.

Had these acts been real, they would have violated basic ethical standards and raised serious mental and physical health concerns.

Google-bombing yourself into horrific baby-killing infamy, however, raises not a single red flag. Basically, Aliza’s senior thesis was to create the biggest PR disaster possible for her alma mater. Some will say this is attention-seeking malice; I say, it’s a clever way to guarantee passing grade. At this point, Yale will probably do anything to make sure Aliza graduates on time and gets the hell off their campus and out of their hair.

60 Responses to “Aborto-Artist Was Faking; No Fetuses Were Hurt In the Making of This Senior Project”

  1. actually Says:

    War of the Worlds for the Internet age, this might be.

  2. actually Says:

    War of the Worlds for the Internet age, this might be.

  3. Columbian Says:

    @actually

    War of the Worlds was a tightly-scripted adaptation of a well-written novel. The artistic merit came not just from the Mercury Theater’s adaptation, but the whole of the dramatic content.

    Shvarts’ inability to build a compelling and consistent narrative without most people calling Bullshit means one thing: BAD ART. Were I her professor, she would FAIL.

    Oh, and by the way, Orson Welles and his troupe used disclaimers throughout the production.

    This is more Milli Vanilli than anything else.

  4. Columbian Says:

    @actually

    War of the Worlds was a tightly-scripted adaptation of a well-written novel. The artistic merit came not just from the Mercury Theater’s adaptation, but the whole of the dramatic content.

    Shvarts’ inability to build a compelling and consistent narrative without most people calling Bullshit means one thing: BAD ART. Were I her professor, she would FAIL.

    Oh, and by the way, Orson Welles and his troupe used disclaimers throughout the production.

    This is more Milli Vanilli than anything else.

  5. who is she? Says:

    Molly Ringwald in The Breakfast Club (above picture) or Molly Ringwald in For Keeps?

  6. who is she? Says:

    Molly Ringwald in The Breakfast Club (above picture) or Molly Ringwald in For Keeps?

  7. Little Liverbird Says:

    Ha ha. If they fail her, she’ll throw a fit about how she’s being “censored” and her “art” isn’t appreciated. If they pass her, Yale will show it accepts any self-indulgent, hysterical, talentless bullshit as acceptable coursework. Glad I went to Columbia!

  8. Little Liverbird Says:

    Ha ha. If they fail her, she’ll throw a fit about how she’s being “censored” and her “art” isn’t appreciated. If they pass her, Yale will show it accepts any self-indulgent, hysterical, talentless bullshit as acceptable coursework. Glad I went to Columbia!

  9. - Says:

    This is complete crap… enough said!

  10. - Says:

    This is complete crap… enough said!

Leave a Reply

Login | Register | Leave Anonymous Comment