Of all nutty student activists, libertarians are by far my favorite. They're like an ideological parody of the Ivy League, whatwith the ruthless individualism, brute competition, and strict adherence to ECON101. They also have the most awesomely grandiose rhetoric on their side, for which we now turn to the Columbia College Libertarians, who have an exciting protest planned for tomorrow:

From: [redacted]@columbia.edu
Date: Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 8:13 PM
Subject: [CCL] Libertarians Meeting MONDAY at 9:00 PM
To: [redacted]@columbia.edu

Noble Freedom Warriors,

Our second meeting of the year will be Monday (tomorrow) at 9:00 PM in 315 Hamilton. We will be elaborating on plans for the year and voting on a change to the club's constitution, followed by the regular discussion.

Also, if any of you are free in the afternoon, there will be a protest at the NY Federal Reserve at 4:45 PM.  Email us ASAP if you plan on attending.  The press will be there.  I'll include the details at the end of the email.

Hope to see you tomorrow!

Protest details — including costume requirements, as described by some guy named "Dallas Moorhead" — after the jump.

Read the rest of this entry »

The long-named Columbia University Chinese Student and Scholars Association: United for China's Peaceful Rising (CUCSSA) has taken the stance, as of a few weeks ago, that "Anyone who offends China will be executed no matter how far away they are!" and said so on their website for all to see. That's what 'peaceful rising' means in Mandarin, right? Someone translate for me.

Luckily for most of us, the Epoch Times tells us that 'anyone' just means Falun Gong practitioners. The Columbia University Falun Dafa Club is understandably upset. This was only the latest escalation in CUCSSA's extremist rhetoric in the months since the Falun Dafa Club hosted a panel discussion in April about China's spotty human rights record.

The April panel, titled "China's New Genocide-Organ Harvesting from Live Falun Gong Practitioners," caused an indignant CUCSSA to try to take disruptive action. They were not yet at the death-threat stage, instead:

The CUCSSA responded by sending out an email to its members the night before that referred to using "flags dyed red in blood to beat" the "high spirits" of Falun Gong. The email also repeated slanders of Falun Gong typically used in the Chinese regime's propaganda.

The Falun Dafa Club received a copy of the inflammatory e-mail and Columbia University police were on hand the next day when 20 to 30 CUCSSA members showed up carrying large red flags, which they were forced to leave outside the lecture hall.

During the panel discussion CUCSSA students held up small placards attacking Falun Gong using terms borrowed from the Chinese regime's anti-Falun Gong propaganda, flew paper airplanes in the direction of the speakers, and in other ways acted in a disruptive manner. Two students from the CUCSSA group were prevented from reentering the lecture hall because of their inappropriate behavior.

First question: Were the red flags actually dyed in blood? All of your questions answered after the break. Read the rest of this entry »

We knew there was a reason we hadn't yet written about Jian Li, the high school senior who sued filed a civil rights complaint against Princeton for discrimination after they rejected his early application. (He claims they held his Asian ethnicity against him.) And boy are we glad we waited, since now he can probably add the Daily Princetonian as a defendant.

In yesterday's annual "joke" issue, the Prince ran, among other laugh-laugh-sigh satires, an op-ed by one "Lian Ji" titled, "Princeton University is racist against me, I mean, non-whites." "Hi Princeton! Remember me?" it starts off. "I so good at math and science. Perfect 2400 SAT score. Ring bell?" Having upturned that modest divet, they keep digging for another 550 or so words:

"What is wrong with you no color people? Yellow people make the world go round. We cook greasy food, wash your clothes and let you copy our homework. Brown people are catching up, too but not before the 2008 Beijing Olympics."

WOW. I mean, wow. After the year that brought us the Dartmouth Review Native American flap and Yale Rumpus' "Me Love You Long Time" ado, it's as if someone just pushed reset. Let's see that again! There should really be an award for the student(s) who, every year, think they will be the ones to transcend racism by displaying it in its crudest form. And who, every year, make utter fools of themselves (and learn that irony isn't a defense). So kind of them not to spell it "Orympics."

If this doesn't blow up in their faces, it's by the grace of God. Princetonian Editor-in-Chief Chanakya Sethi '07 told us he was "aware there were concerns" about the piece, but hasn't heard any direct complaints yet. Then again, students are in reading week. "If there are people who are concerned, I'm concerned," he said.

The best part is, the people responsible for running it -- the outgoing board, Sethi included -- won't even have to deal with the (still hypothetical) fallout. The hate mail, the meetings with deans, the sensitivity training seminars -- all will fall squarely on the shoulders of their successors. Thanks, fellas. It's been fun. Don't let the picketers hit you in the ass on the way out.

P.S. -- The Globe's must-read Brainiac had this first.

Pop quiz: You run a conservative campus publication. Tensions over Native American marginalization have been brewing for some time. Do you a) ignore the issue, b) address it as delicately as possible, or c) publish a 3,500-word philippic accusing the offended group of hypersensitivity and self-victimization inside an edition the cover of which depicts an Indian holding aloft a scalp?

If you picked (c), congratulations. We hope you enjoy your time on the Dartmouth Review editorial board.

Slow clap, fellas. Way to alienate everyone who might maybe have agreed with some of your points. Any reasonable points you may have made have been vaporized.

Members of Native Americans of Dartmouth (a student group with an unfortunate acronym) protested outside the Review offices at Dartmouth Hall yesterday. The AP quotes President James Wright telling the crowd:

"Like an open wound Dartmouth is hurting -- we have all been insulted. ... My Dartmouth, our shared Dartmouth, is one that condemns the deliberate mean-spiritedness that was demonstrated in the publication that was released yesterday."

What did Daniel Linsalata, the piece's author, have to say about the complaints by American Indian students, after such vivid condemnation across the board for his insensitivity? "They're out for blood, so to speak." Zing! Take that, Geronimo! Now go weave Dan some rugs.

As the Crimson's cartoon woes drift downriver, Dartmouth's are just rounding the bend. But this time the comic isn't plagiarized -- it's insensitive.

It started with Nietzsche. Drew Lerman '10 drew a comic for Monday's paper depicting the philosopher coaching a frat boy on how to take advantage of a drunk girl. A few readers concluded that the cartoon advocates rape and proceeded to burn copies of The Dartmouth outside the paper's offices. Here's Caroline Kerr '05 in a Tuesday op-ed:

Where does The Dartmouth draw the line? Would a picture of a black student being lynched from Baker Tower make it into the comics? How about a group of students from Hillel being marched off to a gas chamber under a giant swastika?

A staff editorial in the same edition responded that the comic, while racy, "does not fall under the category of hate speech" and shouldn't be censored. The university's Student Assembly issued a strongly-worded statement Tuesday night questioning The Dartmouth's journalistic integrity. (Full text after the jump).

Misunderstood social commentary? Masculist hate crime? We're gonna safely go with neither. The joke isn't funny enough to be excusable, and the misinterpretation -- that Nietzsche advocates rape -- is too absurd to be offensive. We're not sure where this lies on the overreact-o-meter either, but there are two things we never underestimate: 1) a college cartoonist's ability to botch a joke, and 2) a campus's inability to spot one.

Read the rest of this entry »

Aaaand there's video. Free speech or the shutdown thereof? Judge for yourself, then go berzerk here:

Hey, are you hearing that busy signal right now? Cause things at Columbia is off the hook! Some troublemaker invited Jim Gilchrist, founder of the Minuteman border vigilante group, to give a talk at the famously protest-happy school and things escalated.

We could make some "I killed a man with a trident" jokes, but we just have to let Bwog take over here. Their reporter was live-blogging the speech, which was exciting even before this happened:

Update 9:00 pm: BWOG IS SHOCKED. STUDENTS WITH A BIG YELLOW SIGN JUST CAME ONTO THE STAGE. The sign says, "There are no illegals." Students rise en masse from the audience and rush the stage. The Minuteman and the students engaged in a tug of war with the banner. More people rush the stage, prompting a fist-fight. One female student is kicked in the head. A guy in a pony tail (definitely not a student) rushes the stage and fights with students (several witnesses saw him kick a student) and then banded together with the Minuteman to shout the pledge of allegiance as the rumble spun out of hand, "One nation! Under God! Indivisible!"

Seriously, just head over to Bwog.net now. There's more -- and more photos -- where that came from, and the comments section is out of control (70 162 417 508 and counting). Watch the video here.

Only 24 hours after Facebook launched its "news feed" and "mini-feed" features, students have already organized a mass protest against the site's Orwellian reincarnation. How'd they do it? Uhh, through Facebook, obvi.

It's amazing. There's "People who hate the facebook facelift" (16,794 members), "Students against Facebook News Feed (Official Petition to Facebook)" (89,284 members), and "Facebook looks shit now" (1,679 members). You can also sign the online petition here, or suck it up and sever your social spinal cord on Facebook Boycott Day. Of course, no one would have ever HEARD of these brave efforts were it not for the new features that make us all stalkers -- and stalkees -- whether we like it or not. (Overeager friendsters are paying the price: Now the whole campus knows when you quietly remove Footloose from your list of favorite movies.)

Congratulations, Facebook. You've given us the greatest organizational tool since the truncated yak horn. Too bad its first use had to be protesting you.