Well we’ve come to that point in the summer where its time for the temporary IvyGate editors (Max and Michael, not that it matters) to say goodbye. It hasn’t been a great season for the Ivy League though. Cornell lost everyone’s social security numbers. Harvard is broke and is trying to own English. A Brown student and a Yale student competed to see who could be more annoying. Californians don’t understand us. Don’t even mention lacrosse. And we seem to be forgetting something. What could it be? Oh well, it probably wasn’t important.
But the worst news of all came just this week. Forbes Magazine, the nation’s premier experts on all things list-related, released their ranking of America’s Best Colleges. Here are the sobering results:
1. Army
2. Princeton
3. Caltech
4. Williams
5. Harvard
6. Wellesley
7. Air Force
8. Amherst
9. Yale
10. Stanford
11. MIT
12. Swarthmore
13. Columbia
14. Centre
15. Haverford
…
…
…
Umm, it’ll be a while until we reach the next Ivy League school, so we’ll warp ahead after the jump. Read the rest of this entry »
37 Comments |
|
Print This Post
Read more: college rankings, forbes, IvyGate, rankings, summer, summer editors
If you’re anything like me, you’ve been sitting around wondering, “When will Harvard get the recognition it deserves?” The wait is over, my friend. In US News and World Report’s 2009 “National University Rankings,” Harvard surpassed Princeton for the top spot, ending 8 straight years of New Jersey rule. This comes on the heels of Princeton’s first-place finish in the flawed but entertaining Forbes.com best college list.
Harvard, incidentally, was just ranked “Most Overrated” in Radar Magazine’s guide to America’s worst colleges. The guide cites Harvard’s 25% virgin rate. But would you really want to have sex with that twenty-five percent? In other news, Cornell is listed as the runner-up to “Most Overrated.” When you think about it, it’s kind of a compliment. That is, until you read on and get to the part about Cornell’s status anxiety and Ithaca’s geographical advantages. To wit: “Thankfully, rocky gorges surrounding the campus continue to provide the sweet release of death for those Cornellians who just can’t take it anymore.”
But enough about suicide: following her venerable leader, Columbia advanced in the US News rankings. Yale and Dartmouth stayed the same. UPenn, Brown and Cornell all lost ground. The Liberal Arts Colleges are still unimportant.
Here’s how the Ivies fared:
1. Harvard (ranked 2nd in 2008)
2. Princeton (ranked 1st in 2008)
3. Yale (ranked 3rd in 2008)
6. Penn (ranked 5th in 2008)
8. Columbia (ranked 9th in 2008)
11. Dartmouth (ranked 11th in 2008)
14. Cornell (ranked 12th in 2008)
16. Brown (ranked 14th in 2008)
After the jump, Harvard tells you she’s embarrassed by all the attention.
Read the rest of this entry »
12 Comments |
|
Print This Post
Read more: college rankings, forbes, Harvard, Ivies, overrated, Princeton, US News and World Report
by
James Yu | August 15, 2008 at 10:05 pm
Everyone is getting into the college rankings game these days, and everyone – it seems – has the same goal in mind: to dethrone the juggernaut that is the U.S. News & World Report. But while students and alums of certain liberal arts colleges and lesser-known universities are probably reveling in Forbes.com’s inaugural rankings, the newest kid on the block is unlikely to find much support among the non-Princeton Ivy set this year.
Of the 569 schools included in the rankings, here’s how the Ivies stacked up:
1. Princeton
3. Harvard
9. Yale
10. Columbia
27. Brown
61. Penn
121: Cornell
127: Dartmouth
Brown at 27 already seems like a stretch, but Penn at 61, Cornell at 121, and Dartmouth at 127? How vulgar, indecent, cruel! Some quotes and commentary after the jump.
Read the rest of this entry »
22 Comments |
|
Print This Post
Read more: Dartmouth, forbes, Ivy League, Princeton, rankings, the dartmouth