Roy Hollander’s Chastity Oath for Men
And by “chastity oath,” we mean “becoming a co-defendant in his Title IX lawsuit against Columbia’s Women Studies department and never get invited to another pillow fight at Barnard. Ever.” Caught circulating CU’s “Noble Freedom Warrior” Libertarian email list:
From: Roy Den Hollander
Date: Oct 24, 2008 11:58 AM
Subject: [CCL] Columbia Lawsuit
To: [redacted]@columbia.edu
Dear Libertarians,
I’m a graduate of the Columbia Business School and a lawyer who is currently suing Columbia University because its Women’s Studies program discriminates against male students and male alumni and violates the First Amendment establishment clause concerning religion.
The case is a class action lawsuit, and I am currently looking for Columbia students or organizations to join as plaintiffs. All expenses are being picked up by the MR Legal Fund.
I can be contacted at [redacted]@yahoo.com or (917) [redacted].
Thanks
Roy
Over on the Philolexian Society’s list, they’re replying to Roy with chicks-with-dicks porn. But to discuss the impressive girth of Philo’s collective silicone phallus is to beg the question: MR (that’s misogynspeak for “Men’s Rights”) Legal Fund exists? And… has money?
October 24th, 2008 at 10:07 pm
Would women tolerate men’s studies on campus?
October 24th, 2008 at 10:07 pm
Would women tolerate men’s studies on campus?
October 24th, 2008 at 6:07 pm
Would women tolerate men’s studies on campus?
October 24th, 2008 at 10:15 pm
“Violates the First Amendment clause concerning religion”? WTF? I’m pretty sure that Women’s Studies isn’t a religion. And even if it was, Columbia isn’t a public institution, which means that they can promote any religion they want. Just look at Jesuit schools like BC and Georgetown or yeshivahs for that matter.
I could go on, but I’ll just say that he’s a lawyer? He really needs to actually read the Constitution…
October 24th, 2008 at 10:15 pm
“Violates the First Amendment clause concerning religion”? WTF? I’m pretty sure that Women’s Studies isn’t a religion. And even if it was, Columbia isn’t a public institution, which means that they can promote any religion they want. Just look at Jesuit schools like BC and Georgetown or yeshivahs for that matter.
I could go on, but I’ll just say that he’s a lawyer? He really needs to actually read the Constitution…
October 24th, 2008 at 6:15 pm
“Violates the First Amendment clause concerning religion”? WTF? I’m pretty sure that Women’s Studies isn’t a religion. And even if it was, Columbia isn’t a public institution, which means that they can promote any religion they want. Just look at Jesuit schools like BC and Georgetown or yeshivahs for that matter.
I could go on, but I’ll just say that he’s a lawyer? He really needs to actually read the Constitution…
October 24th, 2008 at 11:02 pm
No. Sue away Roy!!
The liberal idiots at Columbia need to be taught a lesson. It’s just like the moonbat left wing to respond to emails with porn attached.
October 24th, 2008 at 11:02 pm
No. Sue away Roy!!
The liberal idiots at Columbia need to be taught a lesson. It’s just like the moonbat left wing to respond to emails with porn attached.
October 24th, 2008 at 7:02 pm
No. Sue away Roy!!
The liberal idiots at Columbia need to be taught a lesson. It’s just like the moonbat left wing to respond to emails with porn attached.
October 25th, 2008 at 12:08 am
Nothing says trust my legal expertise like an @yahoo.com email address. I wonder if he’s also going to ask me to unblock a milcheck as Royalty of Uganda?
October 25th, 2008 at 12:08 am
Nothing says trust my legal expertise like an @yahoo.com email address. I wonder if he’s also going to ask me to unblock a milcheck as Royalty of Uganda?
October 24th, 2008 at 8:08 pm
Nothing says trust my legal expertise like an @yahoo.com email address. I wonder if he’s also going to ask me to unblock a milcheck as Royalty of Uganda?
October 25th, 2008 at 10:11 pm
I’m glad that somebody else pointed out the lunacy of talking about the establishment clause. Surely no one that ignorant of the constitution could ever pass the Bar right?
October 25th, 2008 at 10:11 pm
I’m glad that somebody else pointed out the lunacy of talking about the establishment clause. Surely no one that ignorant of the constitution could ever pass the Bar right?
October 25th, 2008 at 6:11 pm
I’m glad that somebody else pointed out the lunacy of talking about the establishment clause. Surely no one that ignorant of the constitution could ever pass the Bar right?
October 30th, 2008 at 1:26 pm
For those who think women wouldn’t tolerate a “men’s studies” program, you should know that men’s studies is actually a growing field of study and courses in men’s studies are taught on many college campuses. Also, why does women’s studies discriminate against men? There are many men who major or minor or take courses in women’s studies (as there are women who work in the field of men’s studies). Perhaps you should do a little research on these academic programs before you post.
October 30th, 2008 at 1:26 pm
For those who think women wouldn’t tolerate a “men’s studies” program, you should know that men’s studies is actually a growing field of study and courses in men’s studies are taught on many college campuses. Also, why does women’s studies discriminate against men? There are many men who major or minor or take courses in women’s studies (as there are women who work in the field of men’s studies). Perhaps you should do a little research on these academic programs before you post.
October 30th, 2008 at 9:26 am
For those who think women wouldn’t tolerate a “men’s studies” program, you should know that men’s studies is actually a growing field of study and courses in men’s studies are taught on many college campuses. Also, why does women’s studies discriminate against men? There are many men who major or minor or take courses in women’s studies (as there are women who work in the field of men’s studies). Perhaps you should do a little research on these academic programs before you post.
October 30th, 2008 at 3:30 pm
…really? There are legit men’s studies classes? The whole point of women’s studies is that everything already IS men’s studies.
October 30th, 2008 at 3:30 pm
…really? There are legit men’s studies classes? The whole point of women’s studies is that everything already IS men’s studies.
October 30th, 2008 at 11:30 am
…really? There are legit men’s studies classes? The whole point of women’s studies is that everything already IS men’s studies.
October 30th, 2008 at 5:54 pm
This is completely ridiculous. It does not deserve our time, energy, and attention.
October 30th, 2008 at 5:54 pm
This is completely ridiculous. It does not deserve our time, energy, and attention.
October 30th, 2008 at 1:54 pm
This is completely ridiculous. It does not deserve our time, energy, and attention.
January 4th, 2010 at 4:58 am
Obviously a sick man this Roy Den Hollander and a looser at heart! Its no wonder his ex left him, he would probibly like to think she married him for a GC but in reality she probibly made the mistake and thought he was normal LOL
January 4th, 2010 at 4:58 am
Obviously a sick man this Roy Den Hollander and a looser at heart! Its no wonder his ex left him, he would probibly like to think she married him for a GC but in reality she probibly made the mistake and thought he was normal LOL
January 4th, 2010 at 12:58 am
Obviously a sick man this Roy Den Hollander and a looser at heart! Its no wonder his ex left him, he would probibly like to think she married him for a GC but in reality she probibly made the mistake and thought he was normal LOL