Endlessly Creative Yalie Makes Art with Abortion Goo

Endlessly Creative Yalie Makes Art with Abortion GooWe saw this YDN headine:

For Senior, Abortion a Medium for Art, Political Discourse

And thought the headline editor made a humorously inappropriate mistake. But then we read this:

Beginning next Tuesday, Shvarts will be displaying her senior art project, a documentation of a nine-month process during which she artificially inseminated herself “as often as possible” while periodically taking abortifacient drugs to induce miscarriages. Her exhibition will feature video recordings of these forced miscarriages as well as preserved collections of the blood from the process.

So- wait a- holy shi-

The display of Schvarts’ project will feature a large cube suspended from the ceiling of a room in the gallery of Green Hall. Schvarts will wrap hundreds of feet of plastic sheeting around this cube; lined between layers of the sheeting will be the blood from Schvarts’ self-induced miscarriages mixed with Vaseline in order to prevent the blood from drying and to extend the blood throughout the plastic sheeting.

Schvarts will then project recorded videos onto the four sides of the cube. These videos, captured on a VHS camcorder, will show her experiencing miscarriages in her bathrooom tub, she said. Similar videos will be projected onto the walls of the room.

I think I saw this, once. In a horrible, horrible nightmare.

If L’Affaire Papaya is any indicator, Shvarts should think about getting a security detail for her dorm. Drudge Report linked to the article, and you know what they say: First Drudge, then the blogosphere, then psychotic right-wing militiamen with websites hosted on Angelfire. Due to sudden influx of Drudge-related traffic, YDN’s website is periodically going down. So, until YDN stabilizes, we’re running the full article and a li’l more commentary after the jump. Oh, and in case you’re wondering:

Shvarts declined to specify the number of sperm donors she used, as well as the number of times she inseminated herself.

Well, at least she has a sense of modesty.

For senior, abortion a medium

Martine Powers
Staff Reporter
Yale Daily News: April 17, 2008

Art major Aliza Shvarts ’08 wants to make a statement.

Beginning next Tuesday, Shvarts will be displaying her senior art project, a documentation of a nine-month process during which she artificially inseminated herself “as often as possible” while periodically taking abortifacient drugs to induce miscarriages. Her exhibition will feature video recordings of these forced miscarriages as well as preserved collections of the blood from the process.

The goal in creating the art exhibition, Shvarts said, was to spark conversation and debate on the relationship between art and the human body. But her project has already provoked more than just debate, inciting, for instance, outcry at a forum for fellow senior art majors held last week. And when told about Shvarts’ project, students on both ends of the abortion debate have expressed shock — saying the project does everything from violate moral code to trivialize abortion.

But Shvarts insists her concept was not designed for “shock value.”

“I hope it inspires some sort of discourse,” Shvarts said. “Sure, some people will be upset with the message and will not agree with it, but it?s not the intention of the piece to scandalize anyone.”

The “fabricators,” or donors, of the sperm were not paid for their services, but Shvarts required them to periodically take tests for sexually transmitted diseases. She said she was not concerned about any medical effects the forced miscarriages may have had on her body. The abortifacient drugs she took were legal and herbal, she said, and she did not feel the need to consult a doctor about her repeated miscarriages.

Shvarts declined to specify the number of sperm donors she used, as well as the number of times she inseminated herself.

Art major Juan Castillo ’08 said that although he was intrigued by the creativity and beauty of her senior project, not everyone was as thrilled as he was by the concept and the means by which she attained the result.

“I really loved the idea of this project, but a lot other people didn’t,” Castillo said. “I think that most people were very resistant to thinking about what the project was really about. [The senior-art-project forum] stopped being a conversation on the work itself.”

Although Shvarts said she does not remember the class being quite as hostile as Castillo described, she said she believes it is the nature of her piece to “provoke inquiry.”

“I believe strongly that art should be a medium for politics and ideologies, not just a commodity,” Shvarts said. “I think that I’m creating a project that lives up to the standard of what art is supposed to be.”

The display of Schvarts’ project will feature a large cube suspended from the ceiling of a room in the gallery of Green Hall. Schvarts will wrap hundreds of feet of plastic sheeting around this cube; lined between layers of the sheeting will be the blood from Schvarts’ self-induced miscarriages mixed with Vaseline in order to prevent the blood from drying and to extend the blood throughout the plastic sheeting.

Schvarts will then project recorded videos onto the four sides of the cube. These videos, captured on a VHS camcorder, will show her experiencing miscarriages in her bathrooom tub, she said. Similar videos will be projected onto the walls of the room.

School of Art lecturer Pia Lindman, Schvarts’ senior-project advisor, could not be reached for comment Wednesday night.

Few people outside of Yale’s undergraduate art department have heard about Shvarts’ exhibition. Members of two campus abortion-activist groups — Choose Life at Yale, a pro-life group, and the Reproductive Rights Action League of Yale, a pro-choice group — said they were not previously aware of Schvarts’ project.

Alice Buttrick ’10, an officer of RALY, said the group was in no way involved with the art exhibition and had no official opinion on the matter.

Sara Rahman ’09 said, in her opinion, Shvarts is abusing her constitutional right to do what she chooses with her body.

“[Shvarts' exhibit] turns what is a serious decision for women into an absurdism,” Rahman said. “It discounts the gravity of the situation that is abortion.”

CLAY member Jonathan Serrato ’09 said he does not think CLAY has an official response to Schvarts’ exhibition. But personally, Serrato said he found the concept of the senior art project “surprising” and unethical.

“I feel that she’s manipulating life for the benefit of her art, and I definitely don’t support it,” Serrato said. “I think it’s morally wrong.”

Shvarts emphasized that she is not ashamed of her exhibition, and she has become increasingly comfortable discussing her miscarriage experiences with her peers.

“It was a private and personal endeavor, but also a transparent one for the most part,” Shvarts said. “This isn’t something I’ve been hiding.”

The official reception for the Undergraduate Senior Art Show will be from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. on April 25. The exhibition will be on public display from April 22 to May 1. The art exhibition is set to premiere alongside the projects of other art seniors this Tuesday, April 22 at the gallery of Holcombe T. Green Jr. Hall on Chapel Street.

A few questions arise:

  • How did she save the, er, biological material between collection-time and creative-time? Tupperware? Fridge? Old paint cans in the art building?
  • Is anyone else concerned about drip-potential in an aerial abortion-goo-cube hanging from a classroom ceiling?
  • Why did they time this to coincide with pre-frosh stuff?
 
Pictures. Please. Send to us. Now.
UPDATE: Perhaps the aborto-art is a sequel to this memoir about Aliza’s first period.
  • Ugly Mental Yale Kids

    @wtheckie: Of course she’s not attractive. Would anyone good-looking be in such dire need of attention?

    As an aside: WHAT is the major malfunction with Yale lately? Do they grow mental cases in New Haven or just recruit them?

  • Reason

    @ @ Reason
    If there is an “extent to which [abortion] is ethical,” that implies that there are limits beyond which abortion is unethical. If there is such ambiguity, if there is such a line, then it’s reasonable to have legal restrictions to prevent people from crossing that line. For example, most people agree that some form of gun ownership is a constitutional right, but that indiscrimintely gunning down animals is unethical. Hence, we have hunting permits and kill restrictions.
    But the mainstream pro-choice movement – I’m not talking the papaya-hating ones alluded to in the picture, but your average pro-choicer – has been consistently against any restrictions on abortion rights. No partial-birth abortion ban, no mandatory waiting period, no mandatory parental notification.
    To be pro-choice, then, is to be firmly in favor of a woman’s ability to decide what to do with her own body (and ejecta), and by extension to believe that restrictions on that right are unethical. If there were anything immoral about having an abortion or twenty, then it would be unreasonable for pro-choice people to be against all restrictions on abortion.
    To reiterate, then, according to the pro-choice worldview, this woman was merely exercising her constitutional rights, and should not be subject to censure.

  • Reason

    @ @ Reason
    If there is an “extent to which [abortion] is ethical,” that implies that there are limits beyond which abortion is unethical. If there is such ambiguity, if there is such a line, then it’s reasonable to have legal restrictions to prevent people from crossing that line. For example, most people agree that some form of gun ownership is a constitutional right, but that indiscrimintely gunning down animals is unethical. Hence, we have hunting permits and kill restrictions.
    But the mainstream pro-choice movement – I’m not talking the papaya-hating ones alluded to in the picture, but your average pro-choicer – has been consistently against any restrictions on abortion rights. No partial-birth abortion ban, no mandatory waiting period, no mandatory parental notification.
    To be pro-choice, then, is to be firmly in favor of a woman’s ability to decide what to do with her own body (and ejecta), and by extension to believe that restrictions on that right are unethical. If there were anything immoral about having an abortion or twenty, then it would be unreasonable for pro-choice people to be against all restrictions on abortion.
    To reiterate, then, according to the pro-choice worldview, this woman was merely exercising her constitutional rights, and should not be subject to censure.

  • Ok anon

    Anon, if she’s not a self-righteous cunt, what would you call her? A conscientious, well-intentioned example of femininity? An edgy fascinating creative thinker? — I didn’t think so. Sorry is ‘cunt’ offends you, but it’s apt.

  • Ok anon

    Anon, if she’s not a self-righteous cunt, what would you call her? A conscientious, well-intentioned example of femininity? An edgy fascinating creative thinker? — I didn’t think so. Sorry is ‘cunt’ offends you, but it’s apt.

  • Cornell GS ’10

    @ Reason.

    The difference is that many pro choice people view abortion as a means by which to avoid a woman or girl who is not ready to be a good parent bringing a child into this world. “@reason” is clearly conflicted their definition of “life”. The issue here is not so much one of life, but rather one of the judgment about what someone wold do to themselves for the sake of publicity.

    Further the law often distinguishes between different consequences associated with the same act. Killing someone for self defense if protected under the law after all, while killing someone for sport is abhorrent. (I hate to make the analogy because I know your little mind will jump on the fact that it used the word “killing” and be unable to process anything else)

  • Cornell GS ’10

    @ Reason.

    The difference is that many pro choice people view abortion as a means by which to avoid a woman or girl who is not ready to be a good parent bringing a child into this world. “@reason” is clearly conflicted their definition of “life”. The issue here is not so much one of life, but rather one of the judgment about what someone wold do to themselves for the sake of publicity.

    Further the law often distinguishes between different consequences associated with the same act. Killing someone for self defense if protected under the law after all, while killing someone for sport is abhorrent. (I hate to make the analogy because I know your little mind will jump on the fact that it used the word “killing” and be unable to process anything else)

  • bullshit

    What she claimed to create isn’t even within the realm of physiologically possible.

  • bullshit

    What she claimed to create isn’t even within the realm of physiologically possible.

  • anon

    Bollinger: Yes, and yes. Now, like I said, go to hell.

  • anon

    Bollinger: Yes, and yes. Now, like I said, go to hell.

  • tim price
  • tim price
  • tim price
  • tim price
  • Cornell GS ’10

    I called it, APRIL FOOLS indeed.

  • Cornell GS ’10

    I called it, APRIL FOOLS indeed.

  • F5

    I can’t tell if it’s punkrock and brilliant, or just disgusting and immature. Oh well.

  • F5

    I can’t tell if it’s punkrock and brilliant, or just disgusting and immature. Oh well.

  • columbia ’07

    perhaps unintentionally, this art is brilliant. and here’s why. the pro-choice movement consistently argues that abortion should be legal, but also that there all no moral ramifications.

    this art proves that, moral ramifications are part of the equations. people naturally have revolted to abortion qua abortion as a freedom.

    in close, abortion is immoral and should be reduced in a society such as ours. note however, immoral does not mean should be illegal.

  • columbia ’07

    perhaps unintentionally, this art is brilliant. and here’s why. the pro-choice movement consistently argues that abortion should be legal, but also that there all no moral ramifications.

    this art proves that, moral ramifications are part of the equations. people naturally have revolted to abortion qua abortion as a freedom.

    in close, abortion is immoral and should be reduced in a society such as ours. note however, immoral does not mean should be illegal.

  • brown

    To Dart Alum:

    HEY! We at Brown smoke far too much marijuana to pull off a stunt like this… we would probably forget the abortifacient and have to deal with an actual child nine months later

  • brown

    To Dart Alum:

    HEY! We at Brown smoke far too much marijuana to pull off a stunt like this… we would probably forget the abortifacient and have to deal with an actual child nine months later

  • brown

    To Dart Alum:

    HEY! We at Brown smoke far too much marijuana to pull off a stunt like this… we would probably forget the abortifacient and have to deal with an actual child nine months later

  • brown

    To Dart Alum:

    HEY! We at Brown smoke far too much marijuana to pull off a stunt like this… we would probably forget the abortifacient and have to deal with an actual child nine months later

  • Reason

    @Cornell GS ’10
    “Killing someone for self defense if protected under the law after all, while killing someone for sport is abhorrent.”

    And killing someone for sport is illegal, which is, shall we say, a fairly strong restriction.

  • Reason

    @Cornell GS ’10
    “Killing someone for self defense if protected under the law after all, while killing someone for sport is abhorrent.”

    And killing someone for sport is illegal, which is, shall we say, a fairly strong restriction.

  • yaaylie

    Yale should sue her ass off for defamation and make her take a “medical leave” until, if ever, she fixes those loose screws in her head AND pays the judgement.

  • yaaylie

    Yale should sue her ass off for defamation and make her take a “medical leave” until, if ever, she fixes those loose screws in her head AND pays the judgement.

  • @”Reason”

    Your whole thesis, that legal=ethical, illegal=unethical is just naive. Do you think our legal system, or the American public has the wherewithal to sort through the nuance of such a divisive, if not repulsive, issue as abortion enough to carefully delineate how and when it should be performed? We can’t even agree that it SHOULD be performed, and so striking such compromises would be a defeat on both sides. Hence, it is relegated to the least common denominator of majority rule within the supreme court. You should really put greater effort into calibrating your moral compass than just waiting to see if police arrest you.

  • @”Reason”

    Your whole thesis, that legal=ethical, illegal=unethical is just naive. Do you think our legal system, or the American public has the wherewithal to sort through the nuance of such a divisive, if not repulsive, issue as abortion enough to carefully delineate how and when it should be performed? We can’t even agree that it SHOULD be performed, and so striking such compromises would be a defeat on both sides. Hence, it is relegated to the least common denominator of majority rule within the supreme court. You should really put greater effort into calibrating your moral compass than just waiting to see if police arrest you.

  • hjinks

    it’s too bad that so much time has been wasted discussing a project that only seeks publicity for the maker of it – the important gender issues themselves are already in the general discourse – when there are so many far more important causes that need smart and motivated people to devote their energies to.

  • hjinks

    it’s too bad that so much time has been wasted discussing a project that only seeks publicity for the maker of it – the important gender issues themselves are already in the general discourse – when there are so many far more important causes that need smart and motivated people to devote their energies to.

  • non-yalie

    What bothers me here is the fact that she is invalidating the senior work of other art majors. Across the country. Thanks for making a mockery of my major, bitch.

  • non-yalie

    What bothers me here is the fact that she is invalidating the senior work of other art majors. Across the country. Thanks for making a mockery of my major, bitch.

  • Anonymous

    hey there,

    u might wana surf this Web Blog http://www.pregnancycounseling.org/blog/

    It is specially devoted to Pregnancy Counseling. It covers Relative Links and Resources on below topics:

    Adoption, Couples Counseling, Addiction Counseling and Pregnancy CentersEach of You can look for tons of precious information , pictures, ebooks and related videos

    I am quite sure that you will like this website

    Chow !