Ragtime February 8, 2008: “Take a moment. Bend over,” and prepare to feel the long dick of Ragtime.


–Compiled by James Yu

23 Responses to “Ragtime February 8, 2008: “Take a moment. Bend over,” and prepare to feel the long dick of Ragtime.”

  1. D09 Says:

    That Dartmouth article is not only from yesterday’s issue of the D, but you included it in yesterday’s Ragtime.

    well done.

  2. The King of Spain Says:

    Collegiate Gothic is a silly farce. Only Columbia and Harvard have buildings that aren’t painfully anachronistic.

  3. W'07 Says:

    your link to the Columbia story isn’t relevant to Columbia at all. it’s a link to the DP of Penn. FAIL.

  4. W'07 Says:

    your link to the Columbia story isn’t relevant to Columbia at all. it’s a link to the DP of Penn. FAIL.

  5. sasha Says:

    “painfully anachronistic”? what an idiot. princeton and chicago blow harvard’s architecture out of the water. plus, they actually have a campus and don’t live at the mercy of a dirty city.

  6. keggy Says:

    It’s Winter Carnival and you choose an old D article to post? Go to the middle of the homepage on try LOOKING at the 20 juicy articles covering the best weekend ever. When else do profs voluntarily cancel classes for 3 days of debauchery?

  7. Brown '10 Says:

    So what, plagiarism scandals are so passe now that they don’t even get mentioned?

  8. Generic Poster Says:

    I can’t believe you missed [boring topic] at [Ivy League school]! IvyGate, you really aren’t what you used to be…

  9. Y Athlete Says:

    My SATs are better than yours, Yu.

    But why are you still clinging to it for justification four years later?

  10. Columbiatch Says:

    The Harvard article speaks truth. Even Columbia is pretentious, although few schools actually have neoclassical architecture. Collegiate gothic is a joke. Some of the collegiate gothic out there is so watered down it could look like my local church.

  11. @ sasha Says:

    confusing nyu and columbia? (the “have a campus” part)

  12. although Says:

    the harvard article speaks truth, the architecture up at harvard still kind of sucks. i remember being on a tour up there in high school and my friend, up us stopping at the science center remarked, “man i got to get a picture of this piece of shit. i totally would never go to a place with such piss poor architecture.”

    he wouldn’t have gotten in anyway, but the point still stands. actually i think architecturally yale’s campus is the most interesting. penn and dartmouth are pretty weak sauce if i had to name the bottom of the league in terms of architecture.

  13. true story Says:

    harvard’s science center truly is the architectural bastard child of this shitshow school. there are really only a handful of buildings that actually look nice, but of the few that do, they really do. columbia doesn’t even have that many buildings, and i’d put brown below penn or dartmouth.

  14. Columbiatch Says:

    The one screaming defect of architecture at Penn, Columbia, and Yale is that right next to these pretentiously dusty and ancient facades you have factories, cement towers, science center cubes, etc etc – for want of space. In short, nothing beats the authenticity of Oxford or Cambridge. I will say that for Columbia’s own limitations, the architects did a pretty good job. The layout of campus is schematic, purposeful, and effective: the central “temple” that is Low Library winged by two smaller domes of faith left and right, with Low Plaza serving as the “agora” of the virtual city, separating into several smaller quads of adorned buildings. Columbia proves the thesis that the only way to build a beautiful campus in a packed urban environment is to build it symmetrically. Take a look:

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5629428147683274829&q=Columbia+aerial&total=110&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0

  15. Ryan D Says:

    Wow, that guy who wrote the article on Harvard architecture clearly knows NOTHING about architecture. So so so pedestrian an understanding.

  16. @Ryan D Says:

    as if you do? architecture is subjective. if we don’t like it, then it sucks. and yours does suck.

  17. Columbiatch Says:

    Clearly you have not read The Fountainhead, Ryan D.

  18. Cool-umbia '08 Says:

    That Harvard freshmen must think he’s the smartest kid ever. He uses “big” words throughout when more common synonyms would get the same idea across just as well, if not better. My advice to him is to just leave the 95% of Harvard students that are cool alone and stick to the 5% that are total assholes and ruin it for everyone else.

    “the loose unity of the Harvard aesthetic is testament to our lack of pretension”

    Wow. Just… wow.

  19. Nuke Says:

    I agree with the guy from Harvard -at least at Harvard you get the feeling it is proud of its American roots and its place in American history. Why, it’s downright Emersonian. Not that Boston isn’t otherwise an appalling city with the rudest fucking group of people in the world, however.

  20. cu10 Says:

    Yeah benj!

  21. @Cool-umbia '08 Says:

    Holy SHIT, that idiot really said that?! Fucking Harvard dorks are absolutely brainless when it comes to real-life. Sorry, but SO true.

  22. @Columbiatch Says:

    Never been to Oxford, have you? Lots of industry in and around Oxford. Lots of industry next to many 500+ year-old European universities too. Only a Barnyard girl would be impressed by your “facts.”

  23. @@Columbiatch Says:

    Oxford is not packed the same way as Yale is.

Leave a Reply

Login | Register | Leave Anonymous Comment